![]() ![]() In truth, the Tungsten core HVAP anti-tank rounds produced for the M10's 76MM cannon was very capable of knocking out German armor. ![]() Also, the deployment of Tank Destroyers such as the M10 (and later the fleet M18 and powerful M36) was seen as the counter to the new German tanks such as the Panther, Tiger, etc. Since armored warfare doctrine featured the employment of as many tanks as possible to exploit breakthroughs, it was reasoned that quantity was more important than quality. : Army planners realized that, due to differences in dimensions and weight, 1-1/2 Shermans could be shipped to Europe for every Pershing. Look the M26 up on the web for more info.AnswerGreat Responses! There was an additional dynamic that delayed the introduction of the M26 Pershing into the E.T.O. They were like Shermans, there so many of them the Germans were overwhelmed by sheer numbers. The Germans destroyed them by the thousands. It was armed with the m3 90mm gun and could poke holes in German tanks at a 3000 yards!There is a film clip shown on tv once in a while of a M26 stalking a Panther in the city of Cologne and blowing it to ****.The T34 was the not the great tank some people are making it out to be now. ![]() About 200 were shipped to the ETO before the war ended. We did build a fine tank that was a match for the Tiger or Panther one on one. ![]() Why didn't America build better tanks in World War 2? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |